Rhyolite grinding-milling tools in focus

Assessing kinematics with the help of use-wear analysis

Authors

  • Kristina Doležalová Ústav pro klasickou archeologii, Filozofická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova, nám. Jana Palacha 1/2 116 38 Praha 1, Czech Republic https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4100-6339
  • Jaroslav Řídký Archeologický ústav AV ČR, Praha, v. v. i., Letenská 4, CZ-118 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic
  • Daniel Pilař Archeologický ústav AV ČR, Praha, v. v. i., Letenská 4, CZ-118 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2419-0139

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35686/AR.2023.9

Keywords:

grinding-milling tools, raw material, replica, experimental use, use-wear, kinematics

Abstract

Past societies have used various raw materials for making grinding-milling tools (GMT). These included rhyolite, a hard volcanic rock with a porphyritic texture and pores, which is suitable for grinding. Thus far, no experiments have been carried out involving use-wear analysis on rhyolite grinding stones, and more specifically on Neolithic GMTs made of this raw material. Therefore, in this paper, we present an experimental program designed to investigate the development of wear from the grinding of einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum) on rhyolite GMT replicas. To test the resulting observations, four GMTs found at the Neolithic site of Vchynice were used as a case study. However, the results of the experiments can be used to study these important artefacts in other geographic and cultural areas. The experiment has yielded several important findings relating to the kinematics of the tools and throws new light on their users. The orientation of the tool relative to the user can be distinguished based on the distribution of the use-wear traces. The study of the archaeological assemblage revealed that substances other than einkorn wheat, which was used for our experimental grinding, were processed on the Neolithic GMTs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, J. L. 1988: Use-Wear Analyses on Manos and Hide-Processing Stones. Journal of Field Archaeology 15, 307–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/009346988791974394

Adams, J. L. 1989: Experimental Replication of the Use of Ground Stone Tools. KIVA 54, 261–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00231940.1989.11758120

Adams, J. L. 2002: Ground Stone Analysis: A Technological Approach. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.

Adams, J. L. 2013: Ground Stone Analysis: a Technological Approach. Second edition. Salt Lake City and Tucson: The University of Utah Press.

Adams, J. – Delgado Raack, S. – Dubreuil, L. – Hamon, C. – Plisson, H. – Risch, R. 2009: Functional Analysis of Macro-lithic Artefacts. A Focus on Working Surfaces. In: F. Sternke – L. Eigeland – J. L. Costa (eds.), Non-Flint Raw Material Use in Prehistory: Old Prejudices and New Directions. BAR International Series 1939. Oxford: Archaeopress, 43–66.

Adams, J. L. – Saed Mucheshi, A. 2020: The Persistence of Plastering Technology: Defining Plastering Stones as a Distinctive Handstone Category. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 31, 102344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102344

de Beaune, S. A. 1989: Essai d’une classification typologique des galets et plaquettes utilisés au Paléolithique. Gallia Préhistoire 31, 27–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/galip.1989.2264

de Beaune, S. A. 2004: The Invention of Technology: Prehistory and Cognition. Current Anthropology 45, 139–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/381045

Benito-Calvo, A. – Carvalho, S. – Arroyo, A. – Matsuzawa, T. – de la Torre, I. 2015: First GIS Analysis of Modern Stone Tools Used by Wild Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in Bossou, Guinea, West Africa. PLOS ONE 10, e0121613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121613

Benito-Calvo, A. – Crittenden, A.N. – Livengood, S.V. – Sánchez-Romero, L. – Martínez-Fernández, A. – de la Torre, I. – Pante, M. 2018: 3D 360° Surface Morphometric Analysis of Pounding Stone Tools Used by Hadza Foragers of Tanzania: A New Methodological Approach for Studying Percussive Stone Artefacts. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 20, 611–621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.06.003

Bhushan, B. 2002: Introduction to Tribology. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Bofill, M. 2012: Quantitative Analysis of Use-Wear Patterns: a Functional Approach to the Study of Grinding Stones. In: F. Borrell Tena – M. Bouso García – A. Gómez Bach – C. Tornero Dacasa – O. Vicente Campos (eds.), Broadening Horizons 3: Conference of Young Researchers Working in the Ancient Near East. Congressos de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 8. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Servei de Publicacions, 63–84.

Bofill, M. – Procopiou, H. – Vargiolu, R. – Zahouani, H. 2013: Use-Wear Analysis of Near Eastern Prehistoric Grinding stones. In: P. C. Anderson – C. Cheval – A. Durand (eds.), Regards croisés sur les outils liés au travail des végétaux. Actes des XXXIIIe Rencontres internationales d’archéologie et d’histoire d’Antibes, 23–25 octobre 2012. Antibes: Editions APDCA, 219–236.

Bofill, M. – Chondrou, D. – Palomo, A. – Procopiou, H. – Valamotti, S. M. 2020: Processing plants for food: Experimental grinding within the ERC-project PLANTCULT. Journal of Lithic Studies 7, 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.3079

Caricola, I. – Zupancich, A. – Moscone, D. – Mutri, G. – Falcucci, A. – Duches, R. – Peresani, M. – Cristiani, E. 2018: An Integrated Method for Understanding the Function of Macro-Lithic Tools. Use Wear, 3D and Spatial Analyses of an Early Upper Palaeolithic Assemblage from North Eastern Italy. PLOS ONE 13, e0207773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207773

Caruana, M. V. – Carvalho, S. – Braun, D. R. – Presnyakova, D. – Haslam, M. – Archer, W. – Bobe, R. – Harris, J. W. K. 2014: Quantifying Traces of Tool Use: A Novel Morphometric Analysis of Damage Patterns on Percussive Tools. PLoS ONE 9, e113856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113856

Chondrou, D. – Bofill, M. – Procopiou, H. – Vargiolu, R. – Zahouani, H. – Valamoti, S. M. 2021: How Do you Like your Cereal? A Qualitative and Quantitative Use-Wear Analysis on Archaeological Grinding Tools from Prehistoric Greek sites. Wear 476, 203636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2021.203636

Cristiani, E. – Zupancich, A. 2021: Sandstone Ground Stone Technology: a Multi-level Use Wear and Residue Approach to Investigate the Function of Pounding and Grinding Tools. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 28, 704–735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-020-09488-1

Czichos, H. 1978: Tribology: A Systems Approach to the Science and Technology of Friction, Lubrication, and Wear. Tribology Series 1. Amsterdam – New York: Elsevier Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3453269

Delgado-Raack, S. – Risch, R. 2009: Towards a Systematic Analysis of Grain Processing Technologies. In: M. de Araújo Igreja – I. Clemente Conte, I. (eds.), Recent Functional Studies on Non Flint Stone Tools: Methodological Improvements and Archaeological Inferences, Lisboa, 23–25 May 2008: Proceedings of the Workshop. Lisbon: Instituto de Gestão do Património Arquitectónico e Arqueológico, 1–20.

Delgado-Raack, S. – Gómez-Gras, D. – Risch, R. 2009: The Mechanical Properties of Macrolithic Artifacts: A Methodological Background for Functional Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 36, 1823–1831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.03.033

Delgado-Raack, S. – Risch, R. 2016: Bronze Age Cereal Processing in Southern Iberia: A Material Approach to the Production and Use of Grinding Equipment. Journal of Lithic Studies 3, 125–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v3i3.1650

Dietrich, L. 2021: Plant food processing Tools at Early Neolithic Göbekli Tepe. Oxford: Archeopress.

Dubreuil, L. 2001: Functional Studies of Prehistoric Grindingstones. Bulletin du Centre de recherche français à Jérusalem 9, 73–87.

Dubreuil, L. 2004: Long-Term Trends in Natufian Subsistence: A Use-wear Analysis of Ground Stone Tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 31, 1613–1629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2004.04.003

Dubreuil, L. – Savage, D. 2014: Ground Stones: A Synthesis of the Use-Wear Approach. Journal of Archaeological Science 48, 139–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.06.023

Dubreuil, L. – Savage, D. – Delgado-Raack, S. – Plisson, H. – Stephenson, B. – de la Torre, I. 2015: Current Analytical Frameworks for Studies of Use–Wear on Ground Stone Tools. In: J. M. Marreiros – J. F. Gibaja Bao – N. Ferreira Bicho (eds.), Use-Wear and Residue Analysis in Archaeology. Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 105–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08257-8_7

Fullagar, R. 2004: Residues and Usewear. In: J. Balme – A. Paterson (eds.), Archaeology in Practice: A Student Guide to Archaeological Analyses. Malden: Wiley Blackwell, 232–263.

Fullagar, R. – Liu, L. – Bestel, S. – Jones, D. – Ge, W. – Wilson, A. – Zhai, S. 2012: Stone Tool-Use Experiments to Determine the Function of Grinding Stones and Denticulate Sickles. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 32, 29–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7152/bippa.v32i0.12931

Fullagar, R. – Stephenson, B. – Hayes, E. 2017: Grinding Grounds: Function and Distribution of Grinding Stones from an Open Site in the Pilbara, Western Australia. Quaternary International 427, 175–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.141

van Gijn, A. – Verbaas, A. 2009: Reconstructing the Life History of Querns: The Case of the LBK Site of Geleen-Janskamperveld (NL). In: M. de Araújo Igreja – I. Clemente Conte (eds.), Recent Functional Studies on Non Flint Stone Tools : Methodological Improvements and Archaeological Inferences, Lisboa, 23–25 may 2008 : Proceedings of the Workshop. Lisbon: Instituto de Gestão do Património Arquitectónico e Arqueológico, 1–11.

Gilabert, X. – Martínez-Moreno, J. – Mora Torcal, R. 2012: Pitted Stone Cobbles in the Mesolithic Site of Font del Ros (Southeastern Pre-Pyrenees, Spain): Some Experimental Remarks around a Controversial Tool Type. Journal of Archaeological Science 39, 1587–1598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.12.017

Hajnalová, M. – Dreslerová, D. 2010: Ethnobotany of einkorn and emmer in Romania and Slovakia: towards interpretation of archaeological evidence. Etnobotanika jednozrnky a dvouzrnky v Rumunsku a na Slovensku: příspěvek k interpretaci archeologických nálezů. Památky archeologické 101, 169–202.

Hamon, C. 2006: Broyage et abrasion au Néolithique ancien. Caractérisation technique et fonctionnelle de l’outillage en grès du Bassin Parisien. BAR International Series 1551. Oxford: Archaeopress. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30861/9781841719801

Hamon, C. 2008: Functional Analysis of Stone Grinding and Polishing Tools from the Earliest Neolithic of North-Western Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 35, 1502–1520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2007.10.017

Hamon, C. – Plisson, H. 2008: Functional Analysis of Grinding Stones: The Blind-Test Contribution. In: L. Longo – N. N. Skakun (eds.), ‘Prehistoric technology’ 40 years later: functional studies and the Russian legacy. BAR International Series 1783. Oxford: Archaeopress, 29–38.

Hayes, E. 2015: What Was Ground?: A Functional Analysis of Grinding Stones from Madjedbebe and Lake Mungo, Australia. Wollongong: University of Wollongong. Unpublished PhD thesis.

Hayes, E. H. – Cnuts, D. – Lepers, C. – Rots, V. 2017: Learning from Blind Tests: Determining the Function of Experimental Grinding Stones through Use-Wear and Residue Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 11, 245–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.12.001

Hayes, E. – Pardoe, C. – Fullagar, R. 2018: Sandstone Grinding/Pounding Tools: Use-Trace Reference Libraries and Australian Archaeological Applications. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 20, 97–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.04.021

Kato, K. 2002: Classification of Wear Mechanisms/Models. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology 216, 349–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1243/135065002762355280

Kufel-Diakowska, B. – Baron, J. – Buchner, A. – Lipert, M. – Ziewiecka, I. 2020: Functions of Early Iron Age Handstones. Experimental and Traceological Approach. Praehistorische Zeitschrift 95, 267–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pz-2020-0012

Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1964: Le Geste et la Parole, Tome I: Technique et Langage. Paris: Persée - Portail des revues scientifiques en SHS.

Li, W. 2020: Foodways in Early Farming Societies: Microwear and Starch Grain Analysis on Experimental and Archaeological Grinding Tools from Central China. Leiden: Leiden University. Unpublished PhD thesis.

Li, W. – Tsoraki, C. – Lan, W. – Yang, Y. – Zhang, J. – van Gijn, A. 2019: New Insights into the Grinding Tools Used by the Earliest Farmers in the Central Plain of China. Quaternary International 529, 10–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.10.005

Lidström Holmberg, C. 2008: Grinding Technologies, Social Relations and the Becoming of the Northernmost TRB. In: C. Hamon – J. Graefe (eds.), New Perspectives on Querns in Neolithic Societies. Archäologische Berichte 23. Bonn: Habelt, 69–92.

Liu, L. – Field, J. – Fullagar, R. – Bestel, S. – Chen, X. – Ma, X. 2010: What Did Grinding Stones Grind? New Light on Early Neolithic Subsistence Economy in the Middle Yellow River Valley, China. Antiquity 84, 816–833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00100249

Liu, L. – Ge, W. – Bestel, S. – Jones, D. – Shi, J. – Song, Y. – Chen, X. 2011: Plant Exploitation of the Last Foragers at Shizitan in the Middle Yellow River Valley China: Evidence from Grinding Stones. Journal of Archaeological Science 38, 3524–3532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.08.015

Logan, E. N. – Fratt, L. 1993: Pigment Processing at Homol’ovi III: A Preliminary Study. KIVA 58, 415–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00231940.1993.11758218

Macdonald, D. A. – Xie, L. – Gallo, T. 2019: Here’s the Dirt: First Applications of Confocal Microscopy for Quantifying Microwear on Experimental Ground Stone Earth Working Tools. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 26, 101861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.05.026

Menasanch, M. – Risch, R. – Soldevilla, J. A. 2002: Las tecnologías del procesado de cereal en el sudeste de la península ibérica durante el IIIy el II milenio A.N.E. In: H. Procopiou – R. Treuil (eds.), Moudre et broyer: l’interprétation fonctionnelle de l’outillage de mouture et de broyage dans la Préhistoire et l’Antiquité: actes de la Table Ronde internationale, Clermont-Ferrand, 30 nov. – 2 déc. 1995. Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques, 3. Paris: Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques, 81–110.

Nierle, M. C. 1982: Mureybet et Cheikh Hassan (Syrie): Outillage de mouture et de broyage (9 et 8 millénaires) in Travaux de laboratoire. Cahiers de l’Euphrate St-André-de-Cruzières 3, 177–216.

Procopiou, H. 1998: L’outillage de mouture et de broyage en Crète minoenne. Paris: Université de Paris I, Panthéon-Sorbonne. Unpublished PhD thesis.

Přichystal, A. 2009: Kamenné suroviny v pravěku východní části střední Evropy. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.

Peacock, D. P. S. 2013: Segmented Mills in Classical Antiquity. In: J. Poblome (ed.), Exempli Gratia: Sagalassos, Marc Waelkens and Interdisciplinary Archaeology. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 153–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qf02b.14

Pavlů, I. – Řídký, J. – Wawruschka, C. – Gülçur, S. 2007: Grinding Stones and Handstones from the Chalcolithic Site of Güvercinkayası (1996–2004). Anatolia Antiqua 15, 17–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/anata.2007.1221

Pavlů, I. – Zápotocká, M. 2013: Prehistory of Bohemia 2. The Neolithic. Praha: Archeologický ústav AV ČR.

Risch, R. 1995: Recursos naturales, medios de producción y explotación social. Un análisis económico de la industria lítica de Fuente Alamo. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Unpublished PhD thesis.

Risch, R. – Martínez Fernández, F. – Gibaja Bao, J. F. 2002: Recursos naturales, medios de producción y explotación social: un análisis económico de la industria lítica de Fuente Álamo, (Almería), 2250–1400 antes de nuestra era. Iberia archaeologica 3. Mainz am Rhein: Verlag Philipp Von Zabern.

Runnels, C. 1981: A Diachronic Study and Economic Analysis of Millstones from the Argolid, Greece. Bloomington: Indiana University. Unpublished PhD thesis.

Řídký, J. – Půlpán, M. – Šreinová, B. – Šrein, V. – Drnovský, V. – Květina, P. 2014: „Životní cyklus“ mlecích nástrojů z mladoneolitického sídelního areálu s rondelem ve Vchynicích, okr. Litoměřice. Archeologické rozhledy 66, 271–309.

Řídký, J. – Končelová, M. – Burgert, P. – Šumberová, R. – Hadacz, R. 2020: Grinding tools and circular enclosures: Activities on late Neolithic settlements. In: P. Bye-Jensen – M. Bjørnevad-Ahlqvist (eds.), The Life Biography of Artefacts and Ritual Practice. With case studies from Mesolithic-Early Bronze age Europe. Oxford: BAR Publishing, 23–34.

Santiago-Marrero, C. G. – Tsoraki, C. – Lancelotti, C. – Madella, M. 2021: A Microbotanical and Microwear Perspective to Plant Processing Activities and Foodways at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. PLOS ONE 16, 1–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252312

Sládek, V. – Ruff, C. B. – Berner, M. – Holt, B. – Niskanen, M. – Schuplerová, E. – Hora, M. 2016: The Impact of Subsistence Changes on Humeral Bilateral Asymmetry in Terminal Pleistocene and Holocene Europe. Journal of Human Evolution 92, 37–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.12.001

Smith, M. – Hayes, E. – Stephenson, B. 2015: Mapping a Millstone: The Dynamics of Use-Wear and Residues on a Central Australian Seed-Grinding Implement. Australian Archaeology 80, 70–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03122417.2015.11682046

Šreinová, B. – Šrein, V. – Řídký, J. – Půlpán, M. 2013: Kamenné nálezy z neolitického sídelního areálu ve Vchynicích (severozápadní Čechy). Bulletin Mineralogie Petrologie 21, 157–170.

de la Torre, I. – Benito-Calvo, A. – Arroyo, A. – Zupancich, A. – Proffitt, T. 2013: Experimental Protocols for the Study of Battered Stone Anvils from Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania). Journal of Archaeological Science 40, 313–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.007

Varenberg, M. 2013: Towards a Unified Classification of Wear. Friction 1, 333–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-013-0027-x

Wright, K. I. 1994: Ground-Stone Tools and Hunter-Gatherer Subsistence in Southwest Asia: Implications for the Transition to Farming. American Antiquity 59, 238–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/281929

Zupancich, A. – Cristiani, E. 2020: Functional Analysis of Sandstone Ground Stone Tools: Arguments for a Qualitative and Quantitative Synergetic Approach. Scientific Reports 10, 15740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72276-0

Zupancich, A. – Mutri, G. – Caricola, I. – Carra, M. L. – Radini, A. – Cristiani, E. 2019: The Application of 3D Modeling and Spatial Analysis in the Study of Groundstones Used in Wild Plants Processing. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 11 4801–4827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00824-5

Zupancich, A. – Cristiani, E. – Gopher, A. – Ibáñez, J.J. 2023: Human-Plant Interaction at the Onset of Agriculture: the PATH Project. Antiquity 97, e26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2023.111

Zurro, D. – Risch, R. – Clemente Conte, I. 2005: Analysis of an Archaeological Grinding Tool: What to Do with Archaeological Artefacts. In: X. Terradas (ed.), Lithic Toolkits in Ethnoarchaeological Contexts, Acts of the XIVth UISPP Congress, University of Liège, Belgium, 2–8 September 2001. BAR international series 1370. Oxford: Archaeopress, 57–64.

Published

12-12-2023

How to Cite

Doležalová, K., Řídký, J., & Pilař, D. (2023). Rhyolite grinding-milling tools in focus: Assessing kinematics with the help of use-wear analysis. Archeologické Rozhledy, 75(2), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.35686/AR.2023.9

Issue

Section

Research Article